|
|
| Vol. 7 Issue 1 |
 |
|
|
|
Development Agression
“Development is development aggression when the people become the victims, not the beneficiaries;
when the people are set aside in development planning, not partners in development; and when people
are considered mere resources for profit-oriented development, not the center of development.”
|
|
The Philippine Alliance of Human Rights Advocates, as quoted in, “Human Rights vs. Development Aggression:
Can Development Violate Human Rights?” by Ramon C. Casiple.
The Skwelkwekwelt Protection Centre has defended
aboriginal rights and title to the Neskonlith Douglas reserve
and traditional Secwepemc territory-which includes Tod
Mountain, Mount Cahilty and Mount Morrisey, where Sun
Peaks is located-since October of 2000. On August 29th,
2004, The Skwelkwekwelt Protection Centre and their
supporters, held a rally at Sun Peaks to protest the on-going
expansion of the Sun Peaks Ski Resort.
On the same day, Secwepemc members and their invited
guests began construction of what will be a permanent
structure with several purposes: to monitor environmental
damage at Skwelkwekwelt; to inform visitors and investors
of the ongoing unsettled land issue in the area; and to assert
their title and rights to unceded lands and Secwepemc culture
and language.
A number of structures, including sweat lodges and a
cordwood house, have been constructed on the ground and
have been destroyed by police and Sun Peaks of? cials since
the beginning of the protests. The next phase of development
at Sun Peaks is a $285 million real estate project that would
add 10,352 bed units over the next 10 years. The golf course,
now adjacent to the Skwelkwekwelt Protection Centre camp,
is also slated to be ? nished as an 18 hole golf course.
Sun Peaks is in the process of developing three mountains
for an all seasons resort. Despite awards from skiing out? ts
who have hailed Sun Peaks as an environmental resort,
the reality is that if there are thousands of tourists on these
mountains the ecosystems will suffer.
Sun Peaks is traditional berry-picking, root digging, and
medicine grounds, as well as hunting areas, but it is also
home to deer, moose, bears, beavers, lynx, cougar and
wolverines. The pressures of tens of thousands of tourists
descending on a mountain ecosystem will be immense; the
water, sewage and garbage needs of the resort will all take
their toll, forever changing the plant, and animal habitats of
these mountain worlds.
mountain worlds.
Elders of the Neskonlith Indian band say that all of these
lands have been used for generations for hunting, berrypicking,
and medicine gathering. In a 1977 text, Shuswap
Stories, edited by Randy Bouchard and Dorothy Kennedy,
there is evidence collected from oral stories and legends that
these areas were used by the Secwepemc people.
The Skwelkwekwelt Protection Centre has re-established
itself alongside the Sun Peaks golf course and in the vicinity
of a condo and townhouse development. The Skwelkwekwelt
Protection Centre members point out that the real moneymakers
at Sun Peaks are in real estate, with homes selling
from $300,000 and more.
The Protection Centre was served a trespass notice following
the most recent demonstration, and the court has ruled in
favor of Sun Peaks. This ‘crown land’ that Sun Peaks sits on
is in fact unceded territory. The Skwelkwekwelt Protection
Centre present their case in line with the recent Haida
case and the Delgamuukw decision which acknowledges
aboriginal land ownership and rights.
Janice Billy, spokesperson for the Skwelkwekwelt Protection
Centre says, “The province has never consulted, or
accommodated Secwepemc Aboriginal Title, when it decided
how big Sun Peaks is supposed to be.” She said, “The
trespass notice delivered to us this evening by an RCMP-
escorted government of? cial is clearly a violent attack on our
culture and way of life.”
In 1996, three First Nations (Neskonlith, Adams Lake and
Little Shuswap) ? led a land claim based on the reserve
lands laid out by Governor Douglas in 1862 (the Douglas
claim), which includes the land at Sun Peaks. This claim was
? led with the Federal Government as part of their “speci? c
claims” process and is not part of the BC Treaty Commission
process. The claim is supported by the Secwepemc Tribal
Council.
The First Nations have done work towards documenting their
use and title to these lands, but the claim has not yet been
scheduled for a hearing. In 1998, the elders and community
of Neskonlith Indian band advised Sun Peaks that they were
opposed to the expansion of the resort and asked that work
stop immediately. There was no response from Sun Peaks
and development continues.
Sun Peaks of? cials call the protests the work of a few
Shuswap people who are out of line with what other First
Nations want. Sun Peaks claims the protestors are from one
family opposed to Sun Peaks and that they have positive
relationships with other First Nations. Darcy Alexander, Sun
Peaks spokesperson, during recent hearings submitted to the
court, a press release issued by the Shuswap Nation Tribal
Council, condemning the protests, to support his allegation
that the Skwelkwekwelt Protection Centre did not have the
support of the local First Nations.
However, indigenous peoples who are working to protect
Skwelkwekwelt from further development say indigenous
rights to the area were never negotiated and that Sun Peaks
and the Province are ignoring their duty to consult with all
First Nations and respect indigenous rights and title.
“Indigenous peoples’ rights are human rights,” declared
Rigoberta Menchu at the World Conference on Racism in
Durban, South Africa in 2001. The new challenges faced by
indigenous peoples amidst globalization means indigenous
communities are being threatened by large-scale destruction
of land and privatization of their resources. Globalization
has meant further denial of indigenous rights, and loss of
traditional livelihoods.
Development aggression involves the encroachment onto our
lands for logging, mining, hydroelectric dams, geothermal and
nuclear energy projects, including nuclear waste dumping,
national parks, industrial zones, agribusiness projects
and tourism. Many indigenous peoples face militarization
and human rights violations when they attempt to resist
development projects.
There have been over 50 arrests since the Skwelkwekwelt
Protection Centre was established, including arrests of
children and elders. Because of its isolated location and
the controversial nature of the protest, members of the the
Protection Centre called for legal observers and human rights
monitors, who, in their assessment of the situation, remain on
the alert for potential human rights violations.
The United Nations Environment Program has outlined
several areas wherein tourism can negatively impact
indigenous peoples. They include commodi? cation of culture;
the marketing of cultural items and traditions in response
to consumers and a resulting loss of cultural knowledge;
standardization, the process of satisfying tourists’ desires for
familiar facilities (ie. malls, food chains, hotel chains, etc.) and
economic inequality that is emphasized by tourists of a higher
socio-economic background contrasting with the poverty of
the indigenous peoples.
This economic inequality exists in employment within
resort areas as well, with indigenous peoples earning a low
service wage in contrast to facility users who are wealthy.
Sun Peaks’ $285 million real estate project and $70 million
dollar expansion lies in sharp contrast to the poverty of the
Secwepemc people who have an on reserve unemployment
rate of over 80%. The Secwepemc people, despite potential ? nancial gain, say that they are standing up for future
generations’ right to these lands and resources, and they are
not willing to negotiate away rights and title for any price.
Currently the province’s tourism industry generates 9.2 billion
dollars, with projections to double the pro? ts by 2010, in time
for the Winter Olympics boom. In each region of the province,
$5 million has been invested in provincial, national and
international promotion of tourism. Also, last year BC created
the BC Resort Taskforce (BCRT). This taskforce is paving
the way for the creation of new resorts and the expansion of
existing resorts.
A number of indigenous groups in BC are ? ghting resort
development within traditional territories, including the
P’ilalt in Elk Creek and the Statl’imx who have maintained
a camp at Melvin Creek, called Sutikalh, for over ? ve years,
successfully blocking the proposed Cayoosh Creek ski
resort. The province intends to cut the redtape by one third
in the approval process of resort projects. They are altering
commercial recreation policies to bring them in line with
business requirements. The people who sit on the BC Resort
Taskforce either own, run or are CEO’s of various resorts.
Indigenous peoples are resolute in their call to be involved
in decisions that affect their traditional territories, cultures
and livelihood. The model of development within indigenous
territories is ? awed, development projects are pushed on
indigenous communities by either the government or private
corporations, or both, without their free prior and informed
consent as outlined in the UN Indigenous Working Group’s
Draft Declaration of Indigenous Peoples.
Development cannot be ‘sustainable’ if it seizes or
destroys indigenous peoples’ territories, deprives them
of their own means of subsistence, and erodes their
cultural values.” International Conference on Con? ict
Resolution, Peace Building, Sustainable Development and
Indigenous People, held in Manila, Philippines
The Sun Peaks resort model of development is not
sustainable, the resort will impact negatively on Secwepemc
peoples culture livelihood and rights to their territories.
Indigenous peoples want development, we want our
communities to have an economic base, we need to support
education, housing and the health of our people but we do
not want development that divides us, that offers us money
in exchange for our long term rights, and that does not
acknowledge aboriginal rights and title.
Development is welcomed by indigenous people when there
are bene? ts to the community, when indigenous peoples are
involved as key decision makers and are driving the process
and when indigenous rights and title are upheld.
In the words of Janice Billy, Skwelkwekwelt Protection Centre
spokeperson, “Freedom I guess that is the greatest gift that
we have given this world. We have lands and territories
which have brought the four colors and four directions
together, it is our home and native land which has done that,
but we ourselves are denied our own freedom.”
|
|